Of course, as a matter of fact, Trump did some stuff during his term. That wasn’t the task. The task was to make the case that the things he did made the country better than the alternative would have, and so we should prefer him to the alternative now as well. I’m open to hearing how that’s possible.

Incidentally, re: Roe, you might be interested in an article I wrote a few years ago for Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism called “Personhood and the Scope of Moral Duty.”

Anyone who thinks the country is better off with millions of women being unable to access abortion should at least have thought about all the issues raised in that article, and have data and arguments to support their view.